That's fine for them, however, it is not acceptable to leave us on the private side with defective Rehab subassemblies. That's an additional revenue stream for Autodesk. ".Have to wonder how the DOT's who have signed on with Autodesk are managing these defects."įor example, CalTrans has the resources available through taxpayer funding to hire Autodesk to create effective custom Rehab subassemblies for their use. This defect has gone unaddressed by Civil 3D management since then. The major defect regarding the inability to create correct Mill and Level shapes was noted first by a Customer back in 2006. Perusing this collection you will see there are defects with the Rehab subassemblies. Surprised to see that there are quite a few." I will review your confirmed defect posts, thanks for the info. There is so mouch to do: they need to get drainage back into model space, HEC-22 HGL/EGL calcualtions into Pipe Networks, integrate the Corridor object into drainage, provide Feature Line baseline control of Corridor objects for easier site grading implementation, fix QTO, fix the growing list of Confirmed Defects, create and implement a successful product Quality Control program, achieve much better response time to Product Defect resolution, etc. The Civil 3D Management team has to earn our business by allocating resources to produce new innovative design routines to justify new purchases. It's about getting product out the door for design shops. I think the OP's firm, that mainly does road design work, could generate good revenue using 2012 for at least the next 5 years, if not 10 years. I did not decide to switch to C3D until 2011. We generated a lot of revenue using LDD 2 and LDD 2004 from 2002 to 2011. We were responsible for getting the Civil plans produced and out the door (with our company Border) for the energy client. We had to provide digital plan grading and drainage information (no C3D objects) to them by converting back to 2007 format during the design phase. Their departments were using AutoCAD 2007 and were were in 2012. We were the Civil and they were doing the structural and industrial/piping design work. Typical example: On one one oil terminal project, we worked with one of the large international Civil Engineering prime contractors. Competing Civil engineering firms don't typically share Corridor designs, etc. We deal daily with survey firms using LDD 2004.
I would not be swayed or frightened into making a poor strategic financial decision by the "Version" talk. ".As time goes by more and more work will be required in a newer version, and as we all know version is very important in the vertical programs."
0 kommentar(er)
